Summary Add native MCP (Model Context Protocol) support so AI assistants (Claude, and other MCP-compatible agents) can interact with OpnForm directly — creating and managing forms, reading submissions, and updating fields — without going through screen automation or hand-rolled API glue. Motivation MCP is becoming the standard way AI agents connect to external tools (Anthropic, and a growing list of SaaS products — Linear, Notion, Zapier, etc. — already ship first-party MCP servers). Right now, using OpnForm from an AI agent workflow means either: Scripting against the REST API manually per integration, or Driving the web UI via browser automation Both are brittle and have to be rebuilt per agent/tool. A first-party MCP server would let any MCP-compatible client (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, etc.) manage OpnForm forms and data as a native capability, out of the box. Proposed solution Ship an MCP server (either bundled with OpnForm or as a companion package) exposing tools such as: list_forms / get_form — read form structure and settings create_form / update_form — build or modify a form's fields programmatically list_submissions / get_submission — read response data delete_submission (gated/confirmable, since it's destructive) get_form_analytics — view counts, submission counts, completion rate Given OpnForm already has a documented REST API, the MCP server could largely be a thin wrapper that maps these tools onto existing API endpoints — auth via the same API tokens users already generate today. Example use cases "Create a customer feedback form with these 5 questions" — done conversationally, no dashboard clicking. An AI assistant summarizing new form submissions each morning as part of a briefing. Bulk-editing form field labels/options across multiple forms via natural language. Alternatives considered Public REST API (already exists) — usable, but requires per-integration custom code rather than working automatically with any MCP client. Happy to help test against a reference implementation if that's useful.

Andrew about 17 hours ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Hello, I noticed that the generated forms do not fully comply with accessibility standards. Accessibility is a legal requirement for public services and private companies in many countries. Also, it is essential to ensure that all users, including those with disabilities, can interact with the forms independently. Forms should : be compatible with screen readers ensure sufficient contrast color have error messages announced by screen readers use proper heading hierarchy …

Anne-Sophie T. 4 days ago

🐞 Bug

It would be good to have an option to set a period that submissions are stored so removing submissions doesn’t have to be a manual process. For example: 1 week, 4 weeks, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year. Submissions that are older then this period are deleted automatically.

Development SteamTalmark 10 days ago

💡 Feature Request

If I want to view the images attached to a submission, I have to click on them one by one which downloads them to my computer. It would be better if uploaded images were shown in the submission modal without having to download them one by one.

Teemu Heinämäki 17 days ago

2

💡 Feature Request

Here’s an example of what I’m referring to. So each part of the address can be prompted with an individual line (rather than one space - and asking them to enter all the information. It will help to make sure people provide all of the information we may need. And require each part by making it required. Can you implement this? Please let me know. Gary Gordon

Gary Gordon 18 days ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Make it possible to include sound files in forms

Terrariamoder42 28 days ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Event failed probably due to webhook not being available for couple of minutes but I'm missing option to retrigger. I've resubmitted it manually (edited original submission) but it added bunch of hidden fields to the submission so I think resent retrigger would normally be easier and would maintain correct created date/time.

Archie 28 days ago

💡 Feature Request

We are embedding the opnforms editor in our headless cms and are wondering if it is possible to have the below actions added as postmessages so we can catch them on our end and react to the actions. in the postmessage should be visible what type of action is taking place: when publishing a form when deleting a form when clicking the back button For the backbutton it would be nice if in the event data we can see the current view (from) and to which view we are going (to). so click on the back button you go from “edit form“ view to “list of forms” view.

Development SteamTalmark about 1 month ago

2

💡 Feature Request

Hello! Is it possible to change the OIDC setup to be “normal”, as in: No domain restrictions (anyone can login using OIDC) No implicit routing to OIDC providers This would go towards the more common implementation of OIDC sign in, where the security layer is the OIDC provider, and not the application (with domain routing). This would also imply a change in the login screen, because you’d need to have, like most apps do, two login methods side-by-side — email/password and OIDC providers. With the option to disable password login, if the instance admin only wants OIDC login available. I am willing to help with a PR for this, if the team is open to it! :) Thanks!

Filipe Silva Medeiros about 1 month ago

2

💡 Feature Request

Would it be possible to have the ability to compare two date fields values in validation rules. ie: valid id date 2 after or date 1 Thanks, Pierre

Pierre Caron about 2 months ago

1

💡 Feature Request

I made a simple contract form, with user’s signature, using the pdf function. Unfortunately the signature is not visible on the document, because it is white, the same color is the document.

Yehoward Rudenco about 2 months ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Hey Guys, Thanks for this great App! I was wondering if OpnForm was currently listed on a global Blacklist? My issue: I can’t access any of opnform’s Webservices, because my Internet Provider block’s it.... If you haven’t had an issue, this might be interesting for you, if maybe more customers can’t access, you know why. Regards

Stitch about 2 months ago

3

🐞 Bug

I would like to request support for SMTP authentication via OAuth for Microsoft 365 accounts. Microsoft is gradually deprecating basic SMTP authentication (username and password) to improve security and better protect accounts from misuse. As a result, many organizations are required to switch to OAuth-based authentication for sending emails. Currently, I do not see an option to configure OAuth authentication for SMTP. Adding support for OAuth would allow users to continue sending emails from their custom domains through Microsoft 365 while complying with Microsoft's modern authentication requirements. This feature would help ensure long-term compatibility with Microsoft 365 and provide a more secure authentication method for email delivery.

Wedl about 2 months ago

1

💡 Feature Request

I would like to see the ability to enable an optional workspace path so that any forms in that workspace would have a URL like https://example.com/forms/ / This would allow us to then create access rules in NGINX/Cloudflare/etc. For example, I could create a workspace called “staff” all forms in that workspace then have a URL starting https://example.com/forms/staff I can then create rules that only allow visitors with the office IP to be able to view those forms, or setup Cloudflare access for that path

bigheadsmith 2 months ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Hello, We are getting the below error message when trying to export a record/row from the submissions table, after checking it. This started almost amonth ago my teammember couldnt export then a week ago I upgraded her from read only and still the same error, then on my side now the same error. I’m not sure what’s going on just wanted to make a bug report rq!

Pierce Mooney 3 months ago

1

🐞 Bug

I want to create a pre-filled URL to a form with the same structure, but change rich texts, select input options, header & icon images to that specific URL. We use too much forms here, and maintanance on the already created ones is starting to become a bit of a hussle, so i want ways to personalize forms based on URL.

João Vitor Alves 3 months ago

1

💡 Feature Request

Allow forms to direct users to specific pages in a custom order based on their responses. For example, if a user ranks Programme 2 first and Programme 3 second, the form should show the Programme 2 page followed by the Programme 3 page, skipping irrelevant pages. This would enable more flexible, personalized form flows beyond the current fixed page sequence.

Archie 3 months ago

💡 Feature Request

When editing the submission confirmation email body (in the integration), it is currently not possible to mention form fields inside a link. This would be great! Another alternative would be to allow a markdown view, so we can use the “[text](link)“ syntax, which would allow for this. Thank you!

Filipe Medeiros 3 months ago

5

💡 Feature Request

no se pueden ver formularios, ni descargar

Oscar Garcia Gonzalez 3 months ago

1

🐞 Bug

Describe the bug Once a signature has been submitted, it can no longer be viewed under “Submissions.” Not found To reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: Fill form with signature Go to Submissions Click on Signature of submission See error Expected behavior See the Submissioned Signature Screenshots Environment (please complete the following information): Environment Docker Browser Firefox OpnForm version 1.13.1

Jkobs 3 months ago

4

🐞 Bug