Allow "simple" OIDC setups for self-hosted instances
Hello! Is it possible to change the OIDC setup to be “normal”, as in: No domain restrictions (anyone can login using OIDC) No implicit routing to OIDC providers This would go towards the more common implementation of OIDC sign in, where the security layer is the OIDC provider, and not the application (with domain routing). This would also imply a change in the login screen, because you’d need to have, like most apps do, two login methods side-by-side — email/password and OIDC providers. With the option to disable password login, if the instance admin only wants OIDC login available. I am willing to help with a PR for this, if the team is open to it! :) Thanks!
Filipe Silva Medeiros about 5 hours ago
💡 Feature Request
Allow "simple" OIDC setups for self-hosted instances
Hello! Is it possible to change the OIDC setup to be “normal”, as in: No domain restrictions (anyone can login using OIDC) No implicit routing to OIDC providers This would go towards the more common implementation of OIDC sign in, where the security layer is the OIDC provider, and not the application (with domain routing). This would also imply a change in the login screen, because you’d need to have, like most apps do, two login methods side-by-side — email/password and OIDC providers. With the option to disable password login, if the instance admin only wants OIDC login available. I am willing to help with a PR for this, if the team is open to it! :) Thanks!
Filipe Silva Medeiros about 5 hours ago
💡 Feature Request
Compare date fields values
Would it be possible to have the ability to compare two date fields values in validation rules. ie: valid id date 2 after or date 1 Thanks, Pierre
Pierre Caron 11 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Compare date fields values
Would it be possible to have the ability to compare two date fields values in validation rules. ie: valid id date 2 after or date 1 Thanks, Pierre
Pierre Caron 11 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Different colors for signatures
I made a simple contract form, with user’s signature, using the pdf function. Unfortunately the signature is not visible on the document, because it is white, the same color is the document.
Yehoward Rudenco 13 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Different colors for signatures
I made a simple contract form, with user’s signature, using the pdf function. Unfortunately the signature is not visible on the document, because it is white, the same color is the document.
Yehoward Rudenco 13 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Completed
Is OpnForm Blacklisted?
Hey Guys, Thanks for this great App! I was wondering if OpnForm was currently listed on a global Blacklist? My issue: I can’t access any of opnform’s Webservices, because my Internet Provider block’s it.... If you haven’t had an issue, this might be interesting for you, if maybe more customers can’t access, you know why. Regards
Stitch 14 days ago
🐞 Bug
Completed
Is OpnForm Blacklisted?
Hey Guys, Thanks for this great App! I was wondering if OpnForm was currently listed on a global Blacklist? My issue: I can’t access any of opnform’s Webservices, because my Internet Provider block’s it.... If you haven’t had an issue, this might be interesting for you, if maybe more customers can’t access, you know why. Regards
Stitch 14 days ago
🐞 Bug
SMTP OAuth Authentication Support for Microsoft 365
I would like to request support for SMTP authentication via OAuth for Microsoft 365 accounts. Microsoft is gradually deprecating basic SMTP authentication (username and password) to improve security and better protect accounts from misuse. As a result, many organizations are required to switch to OAuth-based authentication for sending emails. Currently, I do not see an option to configure OAuth authentication for SMTP. Adding support for OAuth would allow users to continue sending emails from their custom domains through Microsoft 365 while complying with Microsoft's modern authentication requirements. This feature would help ensure long-term compatibility with Microsoft 365 and provide a more secure authentication method for email delivery.
Wedl 14 days ago
💡 Feature Request
SMTP OAuth Authentication Support for Microsoft 365
I would like to request support for SMTP authentication via OAuth for Microsoft 365 accounts. Microsoft is gradually deprecating basic SMTP authentication (username and password) to improve security and better protect accounts from misuse. As a result, many organizations are required to switch to OAuth-based authentication for sending emails. Currently, I do not see an option to configure OAuth authentication for SMTP. Adding support for OAuth would allow users to continue sending emails from their custom domains through Microsoft 365 while complying with Microsoft's modern authentication requirements. This feature would help ensure long-term compatibility with Microsoft 365 and provide a more secure authentication method for email delivery.
Wedl 14 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Optional Workspace path
I would like to see the ability to enable an optional workspace path so that any forms in that workspace would have a URL like https://example.com/forms/ / This would allow us to then create access rules in NGINX/Cloudflare/etc. For example, I could create a workspace called “staff” all forms in that workspace then have a URL starting https://example.com/forms/staff I can then create rules that only allow visitors with the office IP to be able to view those forms, or setup Cloudflare access for that path
bigheadsmith 27 days ago
💡 Feature Request
Optional Workspace path
I would like to see the ability to enable an optional workspace path so that any forms in that workspace would have a URL like https://example.com/forms/ / This would allow us to then create access rules in NGINX/Cloudflare/etc. For example, I could create a workspace called “staff” all forms in that workspace then have a URL starting https://example.com/forms/staff I can then create rules that only allow visitors with the office IP to be able to view those forms, or setup Cloudflare access for that path
bigheadsmith 27 days ago
💡 Feature Request
export failed
Hello, We are getting the below error message when trying to export a record/row from the submissions table, after checking it. This started almost amonth ago my teammember couldnt export then a week ago I upgraded her from read only and still the same error, then on my side now the same error. I’m not sure what’s going on just wanted to make a bug report rq!
Pierce Mooney about 1 month ago
🐞 Bug
export failed
Hello, We are getting the below error message when trying to export a record/row from the submissions table, after checking it. This started almost amonth ago my teammember couldnt export then a week ago I upgraded her from read only and still the same error, then on my side now the same error. I’m not sure what’s going on just wanted to make a bug report rq!
Pierce Mooney about 1 month ago
🐞 Bug
More Pre-fill URL options
I want to create a pre-filled URL to a form with the same structure, but change rich texts, select input options, header & icon images to that specific URL. We use too much forms here, and maintanance on the already created ones is starting to become a bit of a hussle, so i want ways to personalize forms based on URL.
João Vitor Alves about 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
More Pre-fill URL options
I want to create a pre-filled URL to a form with the same structure, but change rich texts, select input options, header & icon images to that specific URL. We use too much forms here, and maintanance on the already created ones is starting to become a bit of a hussle, so i want ways to personalize forms based on URL.
João Vitor Alves about 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Dynamic Page Routing Based on User Answers
Allow forms to direct users to specific pages in a custom order based on their responses. For example, if a user ranks Programme 2 first and Programme 3 second, the form should show the Programme 2 page followed by the Programme 3 page, skipping irrelevant pages. This would enable more flexible, personalized form flows beyond the current fixed page sequence.
Archie about 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Dynamic Page Routing Based on User Answers
Allow forms to direct users to specific pages in a custom order based on their responses. For example, if a user ranks Programme 2 first and Programme 3 second, the form should show the Programme 2 page followed by the Programme 3 page, skipping irrelevant pages. This would enable more flexible, personalized form flows beyond the current fixed page sequence.
Archie about 1 month ago
💡 Feature Request
Allow mentions inside links (in emails)
When editing the submission confirmation email body (in the integration), it is currently not possible to mention form fields inside a link. This would be great! Another alternative would be to allow a markdown view, so we can use the “[text](link)“ syntax, which would allow for this. Thank you!
Filipe Medeiros about 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Allow mentions inside links (in emails)
When editing the submission confirmation email body (in the integration), it is currently not possible to mention form fields inside a link. This would be great! Another alternative would be to allow a markdown view, so we can use the “[text](link)“ syntax, which would allow for this. Thank you!
Filipe Medeiros about 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Signature missing
Describe the bug Once a signature has been submitted, it can no longer be viewed under “Submissions.” Not found To reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: Fill form with signature Go to Submissions Click on Signature of submission See error Expected behavior See the Submissioned Signature Screenshots Environment (please complete the following information): Environment Docker Browser Firefox OpnForm version 1.13.1
Jkobs about 2 months ago
🐞 Bug
Signature missing
Describe the bug Once a signature has been submitted, it can no longer be viewed under “Submissions.” Not found To reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: Fill form with signature Go to Submissions Click on Signature of submission See error Expected behavior See the Submissioned Signature Screenshots Environment (please complete the following information): Environment Docker Browser Firefox OpnForm version 1.13.1
Jkobs about 2 months ago
🐞 Bug
Consolidate "Scale" input data in Submissions / Custom Column Grouping
Use Case: We use OpnForm as an order form for our local brewery to make ordering easy for our customers. The Problem: When we use the "Scale" input for customers to select product quantities, every single option generates its own separate column in the submissions table. If we have 4 options for one type of beer, it creates 4 separate columns, making the data table very wide and hard to read. Proposed Solution: Quick fix: Make the "Scale" input display its data in a single, grouped column inside the submissions table, exactly how the "Matrix" input currently works. Ideal fix: Allow users to create custom columns in the submissions view, where we can manually map and group answers from the same product type into one unified column. This would make OpnForm incredibly powerful for e-commerce and order management. Thank you for the great tool!
Naročila Pivovarna about 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Consolidate "Scale" input data in Submissions / Custom Column Grouping
Use Case: We use OpnForm as an order form for our local brewery to make ordering easy for our customers. The Problem: When we use the "Scale" input for customers to select product quantities, every single option generates its own separate column in the submissions table. If we have 4 options for one type of beer, it creates 4 separate columns, making the data table very wide and hard to read. Proposed Solution: Quick fix: Make the "Scale" input display its data in a single, grouped column inside the submissions table, exactly how the "Matrix" input currently works. Ideal fix: Allow users to create custom columns in the submissions view, where we can manually map and group answers from the same product type into one unified column. This would make OpnForm incredibly powerful for e-commerce and order management. Thank you for the great tool!
Naročila Pivovarna about 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Completed
Ability to move the Status Column
It would be amazing to have the ability to move the Status Column anywhere we want on the submissions page.
Naročila Pivovarna about 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Completed
Ability to move the Status Column
It would be amazing to have the ability to move the Status Column anywhere we want on the submissions page.
Naročila Pivovarna about 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Filtered Submission Limit (Count only submissions matching a condition)
Current behavior: "Limit number of submissions" counts all submissions regardless of their content. Once the limit is reached, the form closes. Problem: I use the form as an event sign-up (quiz night). Participants can update their status to "Not coming," but those entries still count toward the submission limit. This means the event appears full even when spots have freed up. Proposed behavior: Allow an optional filter on the submission limit, so only submissions matching a condition count toward the limit. Example configuration: Limit: 30 submissions Count only where: status == "Going" A participant who changes their status to "Not coming" would no longer count, freeing up their spot automatically. Use case: A coffee shop runs weekly quiz nights for 30 people. Sign-ups come through the form. When someone cancels (status → "Not coming"), their spot should reopen without manual intervention. Currently, the organizer must manually increase the limit or reopen the form.
Peter Kizik about 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Filtered Submission Limit (Count only submissions matching a condition)
Current behavior: "Limit number of submissions" counts all submissions regardless of their content. Once the limit is reached, the form closes. Problem: I use the form as an event sign-up (quiz night). Participants can update their status to "Not coming," but those entries still count toward the submission limit. This means the event appears full even when spots have freed up. Proposed behavior: Allow an optional filter on the submission limit, so only submissions matching a condition count toward the limit. Example configuration: Limit: 30 submissions Count only where: status == "Going" A participant who changes their status to "Not coming" would no longer count, freeing up their spot automatically. Use case: A coffee shop runs weekly quiz nights for 30 people. Sign-ups come through the form. When someone cancels (status → "Not coming"), their spot should reopen without manual intervention. Currently, the organizer must manually increase the limit or reopen the form.
Peter Kizik about 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Restrict editing forms for specific users
Is it possible to deny editing forms to specific users that are added as members of a workspace? Sometimes forms are connected using a webhook so editing a form could break this connection.
Development SteamTalmark 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Restrict editing forms for specific users
Is it possible to deny editing forms to specific users that are added as members of a workspace? Sometimes forms are connected using a webhook so editing a form could break this connection.
Development SteamTalmark 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Email tag - Edited
Where you can have mentions on email notification, include one that only shows if a customer edits their submission.
Naročila Pivovarna 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Email tag - Edited
Where you can have mentions on email notification, include one that only shows if a customer edits their submission.
Naročila Pivovarna 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Set custom FieldID or other identifier
To make integrations using the webhook option easier between multiple forms it would be great if we can set custom FieldID’s or an Identifier. If I create 2 forms with both firstName, lastName, email all FieldID’s are different. A custom FieldID or Identifier field that is added to the payload would make it easier to identify each field in the webhook payload.
Archie 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Set custom FieldID or other identifier
To make integrations using the webhook option easier between multiple forms it would be great if we can set custom FieldID’s or an Identifier. If I create 2 forms with both firstName, lastName, email all FieldID’s are different. A custom FieldID or Identifier field that is added to the payload would make it easier to identify each field in the webhook payload.
Archie 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Amount field
When choosing field, I was missing a amount option, for the meantine I use the number field, but it would be handy to gave a amount field, like $23.50 or €23,50 Cheers :-)
Daniel 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
Amount field
When choosing field, I was missing a amount option, for the meantine I use the number field, but it would be handy to gave a amount field, like $23.50 or €23,50 Cheers :-)
Daniel 2 months ago
💡 Feature Request
In Progress
Clicking on a Select field inside a embedded form shifts scroll position
With a form that contains a select field is embedded on a website. If you click on the select field to display the options to choose from the window scrolls up to the top of the iframe. It seems to be related to positioning and focussing on the opened select-options.
Development SteamTalmark 2 months ago
🐞 Bug
In Progress
Clicking on a Select field inside a embedded form shifts scroll position
With a form that contains a select field is embedded on a website. If you click on the select field to display the options to choose from the window scrolls up to the top of the iframe. It seems to be related to positioning and focussing on the opened select-options.
Development SteamTalmark 2 months ago
🐞 Bug