Changelog

Have something to say?

Tell us how we could make the product more useful to you.

In Progress

Auto Submit Form does not work

When filling out the form with the Auto Submit Form option, the form does not fill out and the page remains loading. This happens all the time. I tried the simple way, with hcaptcha, password and url-prefill. It stays with the page loading. Some test links: https://opnform.com/forms/vitr-2-melqr3?d0c0f51b-c20d-431f-8494-470edcb9d954=John+Doe&58864d2a-c332-4b85-ae92-a7e2946cbd36=jondoe%40example.com&e557c4fa-c622-4888-b222-1b0198bd2c3e=Hello%21&auto_submit=true https://opnform.com/forms/vitr-2-melqr3?d0c0f51b-c20d-431f-8494-470edcb9d954=Jon&58864d2a-c332-4b85-ae92-a7e2946cbd36=jon%40example.com&e557c4fa-c622-4888-b222-1b0198bd2c3e=asdfgh&auto_submit=true

Cuathro® 8 days ago

🐞 Bug

Dark mode / light theme switching support

Feature Request: Enable Dark/Light Mode Sync for Embedded OpnForms Currently, OpnForms does not support automatic synchronization with the dark/light mode preferences of websites where forms are embedded. This creates a frustrating mismatch for users who have intentionally chosen a specific theme. For example: A light-colored form appears on a website with a dark theme. A dark-colored form is displayed on a website using a light theme. This inconsistency disrupts the user experience and can feel unpolished, leaving visitors dissatisfied—especially those who prefer a seamless visual experience that aligns with their chosen mode. I propose introducing functionality that allows embedded OpnForms to dynamically adjust their color theme based on the website visitor’s preference. This would ensure a cohesive appearance, improve usability, and enhance the overall user experience for both site owners and their audiences. The functionality actually appears to exist as they have setup light / dark classes but even support can’t get this to work, so is perhaps a bug.

Andrew 13 days ago

3

💡 Feature Request

HTTP Request Logic

HTTP Request / GET Validation Add this option to the Logic system that works to validate input from the user. For example, when the user adds a customer Id or something like that, before moving to the next page or submitting it doesn’t allow to move on if the user don’t exists because it makes a request on the API endpoint that was set in the Logic section.

João Chung 15 days ago

1

💡 Feature Request

trackers.

Hi, someone complained that Crisp and Google trackers are on your site and also on the forms themselves, without gdpr popup to opt out. Can you please made it so these trackers don’t track ppl who are visiting the form URL, especially if it’s cname and the tracking is presumed to be in our hands by the customer? also you can have a popup on the opnform.com pages I guess

Pierce Mooney 20 days ago

1

🐞 Bug

Allow form edit by multiple users (internal remarks)

It would be useful to allow form edit by multiple users. Scenario Public User submits an application form Internal Staff 1 reviews the application form. He/She needs to add internal remarks to the form submitted for approval / review Internal Staff 2 reviews the internal remarks and add commentary to approve / reject the application request For future, opening the same form can see the whole history for audit / recording

Kelvin About 1 month ago

💡 Feature Request

Built-In Scoring Features ( Research / User Feedback )

To allow configuration of specific questions for scoring would be a good feature for research / user feedbacks. Example (Form with 4 Questions): Q1 - Control Question Q2 → For scoring (e.g. A = 1pt, B = 3pts, etc…) Q3 - Control Question Q4 → For scoring Then, the scoring of each form can be calculated based on the scoring logics defined.

Kelvin About 1 month ago

💡 Feature Request